February 24, 2004

Case Closed?

I saw Malcom Gladwell's take on SUVs the other day and was impressed. And I'm not the only one. But there is one glaring problem with it - the table that purports to show that SUVs aren't safe has some problems. I'm reproducing it here:

Make/Model Type Driver Deaths Other Deaths Total

Toyota Avalon

large 40 20 60

Chrysler Town & Country

minivan 31 36 67

Toyota Camry

mid-size 41 29 70

Volkswagen Jetta

subcompact 47 23 70

Ford Windstar

minivan 37 35 72

Nissan Maxima

mid-size 53 26 79

Honda Accord

mid-size 54 27 82

Chevrolet Venture

minivan

51

34

85

Buick Century

mid-size 70 23 93

Subaru Legacy/Outback

compact

74 24 98

Mazda 626

compact 70 29 99

Chevrolet Malibu

mid-size 71 34 105

Chevrolet Suburban

S.U.V. 46 59 105

Jeep Grand Cherokee

S.U.V. 61 44 106

Honda Civic

subcompact 84 25 109

Toyota Corolla

subcompact 81 29 110

Ford Expedition

S.U.V. 55 57 112

GMC Jimmy

S.U.V. 76 39 114

Ford Taurus

mid-size 78 39 117

Nissan Altima

compact 72 49 121

Mercury Marquis

large 80 43 123

Nissan Sentra

subcompact 95 34 129

Toyota 4Runner

S.U.V. 94 43 137

Chevrolet Tahoe

S.U.V. 68 74 141

Dodge Stratus

mid-size 103 40 143

Lincoln Town Car

large 100 47 147

Ford Explorer

S.U.V. 88 60 148

Pontiac Grand Am

compact 118 39 157

Toyota Tacoma

pickup 111 59 171

Chevrolet Cavalier

subcompact 146 41 186

Dodge Neon

subcompact 161 39 199

Pontiac Sunfire

subcompact 158 44 202

Ford F-Series

pickup 110 128 238

Looks pretty authoritative, doesn't it?

First off, the other deaths and therefore total death column is meaningless. What it measures is how often somebody besides the driver is riding. Automobiles are not made safe only for the driver, and what with the steering wheel like a blunt spear pointed right at the driver, you could argue that the driver sits in the most dangerous seat in any vehicle. So you should ignore that other death column, and concentrate only on driver deaths. It's the only way to get an apples to apples comparison. Now the SUVs don't look as bad.

Secondly, this table doesn't take into account the driver. Young and old drivers are bad drivers. The Pontiac Sunfire may have such a poor record in part because it's mainly driven by young hot rodders. The Lincoln Towncar may be less safe than the Ford Explorer in part because the drivers tend to be doddering oldsters who shouldn't be on the road any more, not because the car is less crashworthy - and it might deliberately have lousy handling so as to give grandpa the feeling he hasn't left his living room, which could affect its safety. And anyone only casually acquainted with America realizes that a different car models have different demographics - even with similar age ranges. It's not only that a different age group drives mini-vans that drive subcompacts, but youths who want sporty (and thus drive more daringly) on a budget may prefer Sunfires to Sentras.

Thirdly, the chart is per million cars, not million car-miles. So it doesn't cover milage or how cars are driven (which sort of goes along with demographics). When I take my son to one of his activities, I'm often the only car in a sea of mini-vans and SUVs. Somehow, I don't think there are all that many mini-vans on the road after the bars close on a Saturday night, the most dangerous time to be on the road.

Lastly, it lumps different models together, even though newer models may be much safer (or even less safe) than older ones.

Now I don't think my objections mean SUVs are as safe as mini-vans (I own a mini-van and a subcompact), but I don't think that the chart is conclusive, at best it's suggestive.

I think you're much better off looking at crash test results to get a handle on relative safety between vehicles.

Posted by Kevin Murphy at February 24, 2004 12:57 PM | Current Events
Comments
We welcome comments. However, use no profanity and be civil.