Archive for category Media Criticism

General Sanchez and Editing

I wrote a letter to the editor of my local paper, the St. Louis Post-Dispatch. I haven’t written one in a while, but their treatment of Lt. General Sanchez’s remarks the other day caused a big enough gasket blowout to generate a letter. It wasn’t one of my best, and I knew it was a little long for their taste, but I couldn’t see a way to get from the 350 words I wrote to the 250 max they like without damaging my arguement. And frankly, the word limit just one more constraint newpapers operate under that doesn’t exist on the internet.

First, the letter as printed:

Lt. Gen. Sanchez’s message

“Ex-Iraq commander blasts Bush policies” (Oct. 13), about Lt. Gen. Ricardo S. Sanchez’s address, was appalling. It did not include his criticism of the media: “The death knell of your ethics has been enabled by your parent organizations who have chosen to align themselves with political agendas…. You are perpetuating the corrosive partisan politics that is destroying our country and killing our service members who are at war.”

Yes, Mr. Sanchez blasted the Bush administration, but he also blasted other government agencies and Congress. He said: “The administration, Congress and the entire interagency, especially the Department of State, must shoulder the responsibility for this catastrophic failure and the American people must hold them accountable.” His focus was on getting the nation focused. All readers were provided was another military officer who “harshly criticized the administration’s conduct of the war.” There was no hint of his equally harsh criticism of the press, Congress and political partisanship.

His message was clear: The military has been shouldering the whole load of the war on terror, but it cannot win the war all by itself, and partisan politics has kept the nation from bringing the full range of its power to bear on the war.

He said, “Our nation has not focused on the greatest challenge of our lifetime. The political and economic elements of power must get beyond the politics to ensure the survival of America. Partisan politics have hindered this war effort…. America must demand a unified national strategy that goes well beyond partisan politics and places the common good about all else….”

The letter as written, with the edits (mostly deletions) in red:

General Sanchez’s Real Message

Your article of 10/13 on Lt. Gen. Ricardo Sanchez’s address to the Military Reporters & Editors Association was appalling. Your mis-reporting is exactly what the general spent almost half his address discussing. Somehow you didn’t see fit to include this direct quote about the press: “The death knell of your ethics has been enabled by your parent organizations who have chosen to align themselves with political agendas. What is clear to me is that you are perpetuating the corrosive partisan politics that is destroying our country and killing our servicemembers who are at war.” Clearly, you are among those General Sanchez called out by saying “the truth is of little to no value if it does not fit your own preconceived notions, biases, and agendas.”

Yes, Sanchez blasted the Bush administration, but he also blasted other government agencies and Congress. “The administration, Congress and the entire interagency, especially the Department of State, must shoulder the responsibility for this catastrophic failure and the American people must hold them accountable.” His focus was on getting the whole nation focused. Somehow all that went unreported and all that your readers were provided was a another military officer who “harshly criticized the administration’s conduct of the war.” Not a hint of his equally harsh criticism of the press, Congress, and political partisanship in general.

His message was pretty clear – the military has been shouldering the whole load of the war on terror but it simply cannot win the war all by itself, and partisan politics has kept the nation from bringing the full range of its power to bear on the war. Or in his own words, “Our nation has not focused on the greatest challenge of our lifetime. The political and economic elements of power must get beyond the politics to ensure the survival of America. Partisan politics have hindered this war effort and America should not accept this. America must demand a unified national strategy that goes well beyond partisan politics and places the common good about all else. All too often our politicians have chosen loyalty to their political party above loyalty to the constitution because of their lust for power.”

So as always, I ponder over the edits. Some were good, such as removing my weasel word “pretty”. Some are just annoying, like the change of “Not a hint of his…” change to “There was no hint of his…” which is what you’d expect of an english major who doesn’t see a verb and who has been taught to abhor sentance fragments. Some were clearly for length, such as “And America should not accept this.” Re-reading the letter I wish I had swaped the ending around to end with my own words instead of the General’s, but I can’t expect them to clean up my act to that extent. But some make me see red – such as removing the last line about putting political party above loyalty to the constitution, or my linking at the start what the General was complaining about and how they reported his speech. I really think they were trying to soften General Sanchez’s criticism of the press, and of the Democrats.

That’s why I have a blog, that’s why I use the internet and primary sources as much as possible for my news, and that’s why newspapers have lost the trust of the majority of their readers.

The Joys Of A Democrat In The White House

In some ways I look forward to a President from the Democratic party. Overnight, the Democrats will be for the war on terror. I know that right now the right is calling the Democrats the Surrendercrats and otherwise calling out the lack of a Democratic backbone, but we shouldn’t lose sight of the fact that with a Democrat in the White House the Democratic party doesn’t just rattle sabers, it slashes away with great gusto. Bill Clinton had no trouble attacking other countries, and the Democrats didn’t say boo. Our attack on Serbia over Kosovo was pre-emptive, our airforce bombed Serbian state television — killing civilians and members of the press — because we didn’t like what they were broadcasting.

And lest we forget, it was the Clinton administration that invented “extraordinary rendition. It was Peace Prize winner Al Gore who defended the procedure in interal deliberations thusly: ““That’s a no-brainer. Of course it’s a violation of international law, that’s why it’s a covert action. The guy is a terrorist. Go grab his ass.”

Since the mainstream media isn’t just made up of Democrats, but has become a chief supporter of Democrats, the tone of stories will change overnight. Our successes in Iraq will at last be reported; the economy will improve overnight (except for those areas that the Democrats want to change, so healthcare will still be in crisis, and the deficit will be mentioned only in the context of the need to raise taxes). And with the press not feeling the need to smear Bush any way they can, the tone of overall reportage in general will improve, while the stores about how bad the US is will dramatically decline, so much so that our stature in the world will improve (which naturally will be described as result of the policies of our wise and beloved Democratic President). Yes, the stories the US press pushes are picked up internationally; the idea that somehow our press stops at the waters edge and has no influence on how the rest of the world sees us is laughably naive. It’s human nature to assume that a country’s own press is more accurate than any foreign reportage.

You might think I’m cynical – but I don’t. I think I’m quite scientific, since I’ve seen this happen before.

Arab American Actors

When my local paper ran this article about Arab-American actors typcast as terrorists, they put the headline “Do these men look like terrorists” over the pictures of three American actors of middle eastern descent. So I thought to myself, they don’t look like IRA terrorists, or ETA terrorists, or LTTE terrorists, or FARC terrorists, but oddly enough, they do look like Arab terrorists (Al-Qaeda, Hezbollah, Hamas spring to mind). Really, what does a terrorist look like?

I suppose fewer movies should be made about current events? Or should TV and movies employ blue-eyed blondes to protray arabs?

Left unsaid is that the complaint used to be that blacks were always pimps and hustlers, asians were martial artists or brainiacs, italians always mobsters, etc.

As far as I can tell, the claim is that Hollywood, that liberal bastion, is stereotyping Arab-Americans. Must be the Jews fault.

Raindrops On Roses

A Few of My Favorite Things, St. Louis Post-Dispatch version:

Eric Mink has the day off today.

When the dog bites
When the bee stings
When I’m feeling sad
I simply remember my favorite things
And then I don’t feel so bad

Tags:

Lileks: Reality’s Mole In The Liberal Belly

It is said that the Strib was being foolish in demoting Mr James Lileks to a beat reporter. And I have no doubt that is true from the standpoint of the pecking order at newspapers. But I’d like to take a step back and take a second look.

Have you ever read Lileks? I happen to love his writing, but 90% of it is about the mundanities of life – fully half of it revolves around going to Target, being at Target, the trip home from Target, and just thinking about Target and Target-like stores. The crazy thing is he manages to make his experience of the Sturgeon part of life seem fun and interesting. The other 10% he weaves in revelations on modern life – politics, architecture, pop art and culture, home improvement – that astound.

Have you read the news part of a newspaper recently? Dull stories written from an uncritical liberal point of view that are leavened with 20% liberal pieties. News that might reflect poorly on any oppressed people (i.e. anyone who isn’t a white male, or white males in journalism and academia, the two honorary oppressed while male groups) is routinely suppressed from the paper or omitted from stories.

Just think what the impact of having Lileks write some of these stories. Readership might actually go up, as (non-liberal and liberals alike) people actually began to read the news part of paper again. Spot the Lileks could become a local pastime and even a college drinking game (not that we endorse that sort of thing here at FunMurphys). And at last, news stories wouldn’t be written from that insufferable liberal viewpoint and instead of liberal pieties we would get real insight along with all the relevant facts. What a deal!

The blog debate over newspapers isn’t about whether they’ll die, but when. And the Strib intends to do something about it. They are going to put their best writer on the one topic everybody agrees should be the strength (but isn’t) of local newspapers – local news reporting. So what’s the reaction from all those people who’ve been telling newspapers to do exactly that? Outrage.

So I’m going to have to disagree here, this makes perfect sense from the Strib’s point of view, and Lileks will have to make up his mind whether he wants to be reality’s mole in the belly of the liberal beast, or does he want to sever his ties with an organization that needs him more than he needs them. I’m hoping he choses the mole job, but fully expecting him to sever away.

Tags: , ,

We Can’t Handle The Truth

Last night I was watching the local news (mainly for the weather) when they did a story about a Washington University coed raped in her dorm room. They talked about the suspect, read a description, and never mentioned he’s black. I only know that because they showed the composite sketch. My wife thought it odd that they would mention gender, height, weight, age, hair length, even the cap he was wearing, in describing him, but not his skin color. Fox 2 News has the same lack of information. KMOV, the TV news outlet in town we usually watch (and I’m not sure why we were watching KSDK instead of KMOV – maybe because Karen Foss retired) has no trouble in using his skin color. I guess KMOV isn’t worried all us bigots will be confirmed in our error.

So today I’m not surprised by this news: Another rape a Duke University, but no mention of (black) skin color. The media just keeps protecting us from our baser instincts – or so they think.

Think they’d ever caught Michael Devlin if they didn’t include the color of the pickup in its description? White, BTW.

Tags:

A Tipping Point?

Are there already more mil bloggers in country than members of the MSM?

At what point will there be more bloggers embedded in Iraq than members in good standing of the MSM? I ask because Michelle Malkin and Bryan Preston are going over, joining Bill Roggio and Bill INDC/Iraq among others.

Since Michelle has decided to go on her own nickle (donations accepted), she asked that Eason Jordan pay Kathleen “Who are you to question me?” Carroll’s way instead:

“I have notified Jordan of our plans and encouraged him to move forward with his trip and his offer to bring Curt of Flopping Aces.More importantly, I have asked Jordan to extend the travel funds and security coverage he would have spent on me to the AP’s Kathleen Carroll.

Ms. Carroll, you may remember, was the AP executive who derided bloggers for sitting at home instead of traveling abroad to do their own reporting during the fauxtography debacle last summer:

“It’s hard to imagine how someone sitting in an air-conditioned office or broadcast studio many thousands of miles from the scene can decide what occurred on the ground with any degree of accuracy,” said Kathleen Carroll, AP’s senior vice president and executive editor.

Yet, from her own comfortable office, Ms. Carroll has decided that bloggers, Jordan, the U.S. military, and Iraqi government officials are all wrong to question her news organization’s questionable news sources.

Questionable news sources? Pretty strong words, but the Confederate Yankee digs into the story the way reporters in the movies do:

The only way I can do this is to take the 61 stories Curt found, Google the keywords and dates of the described events, and see if other news organizations can corroborate the details of the events provided. Those with LexisNexis access might be able to do a better job of verifying or disputing these accounts, but you get to research using the tool set you have, not the tools you would like to have. As I don’t have the time to do a complete search, I’ll attempt to search through roughly the first half of the 61 stories using Jamil Hussein as a source.”

The result?  Short answer – not pretty. Long answer – go read it yourself.

The question isn’t whether (some) bloggers do journalism (this one never soils his hands that way), but do journalists do journalism anymore? Or do they just write the story a source gives them, no questions asked.

Tags: ,

Business As Usual, or The Press Lies

I’m shockedshocked that someone would accuse the news media of turning a blind eye to the provenence of their sources.

Next people are going to claim that the news media shamelessly plugged the silicone breast implant scare no matter how many times it was debunked, or that they used pre-packaged interviews provided by trial lawyers, or just in general demonstrated a reckless disregard for the truth.

I mean, once the media finds out somebody stages fradulent events, they’d stop using them.

So shame on you, Jeff Medcalf, even writing a song about it.

I mean, it’s not like the business model is selling your attention to advertisors, it’s selling you the truth. Right?

Romney Sets A Reporter Straight

I want to have Mitt Romney’s baby:

That has to be the best smooth rebuke I’ve seen.

Via Powerline.

Tags:

Another Press Fault

You remember how the American press was bemoaning the perils of embedding – no, not that they would be physically hurt, but that they would become beholden to the American Armed Forces, and horrors! might even favor the military because they spent so much time with them.

Well, why don’t they have similar worries when it comes to foreign stringers, who do the bulk of the international reporting for the American press? Instead, they have no worries about who they hire to do their reporting, no matter how often it leads to biased, inaccurate, or faked coverage. Apparently the press thinks foriegners are made of far sterner stuff than Americans, able to withstand any and all entanglements, biases, and scrupulously fair and honest.

Tags: ,