Archive for category Culture

Why Do You Want To Skin The Cat?

What do the homeless, brutal cops, and polluting cars have in common?

They all follow a power law distribution, not a normal distribution, and so need power law solutions according to the always interesting Malcolm Gladwell:

Power-law solutions have little appeal to the right, because they involve special treatment for people who do not deserve special treatment; and they have little appeal to the left, because their emphasis on efficiency over fairness suggests the cold number-crunching of Chicago-school cost-benefit analysis. Even the promise of millions of dollars in savings or cleaner air or better police departments cannot entirely compensate for such discomfort.

What is doing the same thing over and over but expecting a different result this time?

Tags:

I Have A Dream

Rev. Martin Luther King’s 1963 “I Have a Dream” speech is famous, and with good reason. It’s magnificent, and when I tried to just excerpt it, I found I couldn’t leave anything out.

Five score years ago, a great American, in whose symbolic shadow we stand signed the Emancipation Proclamation. This momentous decree came as a great beacon light of hope to millions of Negro slaves who had been seared in the flames of withering injustice. It came as a joyous daybreak to end the long night of captivity. But one hundred years later, we must face the tragic fact that the Negro is still not free.One hundred years later, the life of the Negro is still sadly crippled by the manacles of segregation and the chains of discrimination. One hundred years later, the Negro lives on a lonely island of poverty in the midst of a vast ocean of material prosperity. One hundred years later, the Negro is still languishing in the corners of American society and finds himself an exile in his own land.

So we have come here today to dramatize an appalling condition. In a sense we have come to our nation’s capital to cash a check. When the architects of our republic wrote the magnificent words of the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence, they were signing a promissory note to which every American was to fall heir.

This note was a promise that all men would be guaranteed the inalienable rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. It is obvious today that America has defaulted on this promissory note insofar as her citizens of color are concerned. Instead of honoring this sacred obligation, America has given the Negro people a bad check which has come back marked “insufficient funds.” But we refuse to believe that the bank of justice is bankrupt. We refuse to believe that there are insufficient funds in the great vaults of opportunity of this nation.

So we have come to cash this check — a check that will give us upon demand the riches of freedom and the security of justice. We have also come to this hallowed spot to remind America of the fierce urgency of now. This is no time to engage in the luxury of cooling off or to take the tranquilizing drug of gradualism. Now is the time to rise from the dark and desolate valley of segregation to the sunlit path of racial justice. Now is the time to open the doors of opportunity to all of God’s children. Now is the time to lift our nation from the quicksands of racial injustice to the solid rock of brotherhood.

It would be fatal for the nation to overlook the urgency of the moment and to underestimate the determination of the Negro. This sweltering summer of the Negro’s legitimate discontent will not pass until there is an invigorating autumn of freedom and equality. Nineteen sixty-three is not an end, but a beginning. Those who hope that the Negro needed to blow off steam and will now be content will have a rude awakening if the nation returns to business as usual. There will be neither rest nor tranquility in America until the Negro is granted his citizenship rights.

The whirlwinds of revolt will continue to shake the foundations of our nation until the bright day of justice emerges. But there is something that I must say to my people who stand on the warm threshold which leads into the palace of justice. In the process of gaining our rightful place we must not be guilty of wrongful deeds. Let us not seek to satisfy our thirst for freedom by drinking from the cup of bitterness and hatred.

We must forever conduct our struggle on the high plane of dignity and discipline. we must not allow our creative protest to degenerate into physical violence. Again and again we must rise to the majestic heights of meeting physical force with soul force.

The marvelous new militancy which has engulfed the Negro community must not lead us to distrust of all white people, for many of our white brothers, as evidenced by their presence here today, have come to realize that their destiny is tied up with our destiny and their freedom is inextricably bound to our freedom.

We cannot walk alone. And as we walk, we must make the pledge that we shall march ahead. We cannot turn back. There are those who are asking the devotees of civil rights, “When will you be satisfied?” we can never be satisfied as long as our bodies, heavy with the fatigue of travel, cannot gain lodging in the motels of the highways and the hotels of the cities. We cannot be satisfied as long as the Negro’s basic mobility is from a smaller ghetto to a larger one. We can never be satisfied as long as a Negro in Mississippi cannot vote and a Negro in New York believes he has nothing for which to vote. No, no, we are not satisfied, and we will not be satisfied until justice rolls down like waters and righteousness like a mighty stream.

I am not unmindful that some of you have come here out of great trials and tribulations. Some of you have come fresh from narrow cells. Some of you have come from areas where your quest for freedom left you battered by the storms of persecution and staggered by the winds of police brutality. You have been the veterans of creative suffering. Continue to work with the faith that unearned suffering is redemptive.

Go back to Mississippi, go back to Alabama, go back to Georgia, go back to Louisiana, go back to the slums and ghettos of our northern cities, knowing that somehow this situation can and will be changed. Let us not wallow in the valley of despair. I say to you today, my friends, that in spite of the difficulties and frustrations of the moment, I still have a dream. It is a dream deeply rooted in the American dream.

I have a dream that one day this nation will rise up and live out the true meaning of its creed: “We hold these truths to be self-evident: that all men are created equal.” I have a dream that one day on the red hills of Georgia the sons of former slaves and the sons of former slaveowners will be able to sit down together at a table of brotherhood. I have a dream that one day even the state of Mississippi, a desert state, sweltering with the heat of injustice and oppression, will be transformed into an oasis of freedom and justice. I have a dream that my four children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character. I have a dream today.

I have a dream that one day the state of Alabama, whose governor’s lips are presently dripping with the words of interposition and nullification, will be transformed into a situation where little black boys and black girls will be able to join hands with little white boys and white girls and walk together as sisters and brothers. I have a dream today. I have a dream that one day every valley shall be exalted, every hill and mountain shall be made low, the rough places will be made plain, and the crooked places will be made straight, and the glory of the Lord shall be revealed, and all flesh shall see it together. This is our hope. This is the faith with which I return to the South. With this faith we will be able to hew out of the mountain of despair a stone of hope. With this faith we will be able to transform the jangling discords of our nation into a beautiful symphony of brotherhood. With this faith we will be able to work together, to pray together, to struggle together, to go to jail together, to stand up for freedom together, knowing that we will be free one day.

This will be the day when all of God’s children will be able to sing with a new meaning, “My country, ’tis of thee, sweet land of liberty, of thee I sing. Land where my fathers died, land of the pilgrim’s pride, from every mountainside, let freedom ring.” And if America is to be a great nation, this must become true. So let freedom ring from the prodigious hilltops of New Hampshire. Let freedom ring from the mighty mountains of New York. Let freedom ring from the heightening Alleghenies of Pennsylvania! Let freedom ring from the snowcapped Rockies of Colorado! Let freedom ring from the curvaceous peaks of California! But not only that; let freedom ring from Stone Mountain of Georgia! Let freedom ring from Lookout Mountain of Tennessee! Let freedom ring from every hill and every molehill of Mississippi. From every mountainside, let freedom ring.

When we let freedom ring, when we let it ring from every village and every hamlet, from every state and every city, we will be able to speed up that day when all of God’s children, black men and white men, Jews and Gentiles, Protestants and Catholics, will be able to join hands and sing in the words of the old Negro spiritual, “Free at last! free at last! thank God Almighty, we are free at last!”

 

As great as the impact of reading it is, I can only imagine that it was ten times greater hearing it delivered by such an orator. Talk about communicating a vision, this speech delivers on the vision of a nation free of racial divisions while appealing to both the historical vision of the United States and to clear Christian imagery.

So are we there yet? Can all of God’s children, black men and white men, Jews and Gentiles, Protestants and Catholics, join hands and sing in the words of the old Negro spiritual, “Free at last! free at last! thank God Almighty, we are free at last!” Well, not quite, but we are far, far closer now than we were then. I’m crazy enough to think that my children’s generation will actually be there with few exceptions.

While a pervasive and oppressive racism was clearly the dominate factor in a black person’s life in 1963, that is no longer the case. Other factors are now equally or more significant than racism in negatively affecting black people, although the concentrating effect of population disparity on minorities is hard for a non-minority to judge, as I pointed out in a post I titled the perception of racism but could have been titled the experience of racism.

That’s what Bill Cosby’s crusade is about. It’s said that generals fight the last war; Mr. Cosby is trying to get the troops to fight the current war. The struggle for civil rights is over, the struggle now is what to do with them.

There is still some controversy over the Rev. King’s remarks centering on how to reach the vision he so wonderfully provided. What kind of transition will it take and how long should it last? While I think Rev. Kings vision is still as important and worthwile as the day he spoke on the steps of the Lincoln memorial, I don’t think we can look back to his every utterance as a roadmap. Yes, he pointed out that black people would need help on the way to full equality, but 45 years later that isn’t the question, the question is what form should it take, if any? If we are this close to “Free at last, free at last, free at last” does looking to the past hurt or help getting all the way there? And funny how people use his opposition to Vietnam to oppose any war they don’t like but they fail to mention such opposition when we are fighting a war they either support or don’t care about.

Rev. King provided us the vision in a clear and compelling form; it’s up to us to try every day to live up to that vision.

(Yes, I realize that yesterday is the day set aside to celebrate the good Reverend’s accomplishments, but time as always presses and while I started this yesterday, I couldn’t finish it until today.)

Different But Equal

Jim Pinkerton looks at Maureen Dowd’s lastest book, Are Men Necessary? and while he starts out good, he goes astray. I think one area that Feminism went astray was the outlook that equality meant sameness, and so the way to be equal to men was to be the same. I’m all for equality, but that doesn’t mean sameness. Different but equal makes perfect sense to me. And so it seems to me that when women try to compete sexually as if they were men, macho men, disaster strikes. That’s the direction mainstream Feminism took and got the pants beat off them, and I do mean that literally. I know men tend to be protrayed as idiots by the media, but it is the height of folly to think that women can try to out masculine the most masculine of men.

And so Jim’s right that Hef is laughing and Maureen is crying, but it isn’t because Men hold all the cards and always have; it’s because Maureen tried to beat Hef at his own game.

Tags:

Once More Into The Breach

As I have mentioned before, I am a death penalty agnostic. But one thing the irks me about certain death penalty opponents is that they think that not just has an innocent been put to death, but only innocents have been put to death (leastways if they are a minority). Marlin Gray was executed for the rape and death of two sisters, and there are some people who are convinced he was innocent. I don’t know for sure since I wasn’t there, but the evidence is pretty clear and convincing. Even Bill McClellan, who’s a soft touch for a sob story, sits through all the trials and says the mystery isn’t who but why. This reflexive defense of anyone sentenced to death is as annoying than the other extreme – no innocent person has ever been put to death.

Tags: ,

Law Reform

My biggest complaint with the civil justice system isn’t the system itself, but us. You know, Americans. We’re the ones who have adopted the idea that anything, and I mean anything can be litigated. Everything is open for review by fifteen strangers: twelve people off the street, two paid advocates, and a judge. There is no aspect of human interaction – business, personal, intimate, property – that can’t be hauled into a court at a later date for a do over. You may be thinking great, we need more oversight. But there is a penalty for all this, both in terms of direct costs paid to the practitioners and the opportunity costs in changed behavior. And our civil system doesn’t even protend to be speedly like our criminal system. Cases can drag on for years, which means that not only is everything subject to review, but it can be years before anything is final. That surely has to be a big drag on invention, risk taking, and business in general.

Another facet of the problem is that when you have breakthroughs in technology or science, everyone benefits. When you have breakthroughs in finance, everyone benefits as improved financial helps new ventures get financed. These breakthroughs are driven by the quality and number of people involved in these fields. But when it comes to law, it seems that breakthroughs there only benefit lawyers, which only increases the attraction to a field that is way over represented and talented in America. The explosion in class action lawsuits hasn’t done a thing for the average person — if anything it’s hurt them overall, but it sure has made a bunch of lawyers wealthy beyond the dreams of avarice.

It used to be that farsighted rulers would periodically reform the legal code (Hammurabi was the first recorded). I know the legislatures across the land are too busy with far more sexy and immediate stuff, but I think we’re getting to the point that we really need to consider the kind of top to bottom overhaul to rein in the reach of lawsuits and combine it with a wholesale pruning of government regulation. But that won’t happen until we demand it. Just having a “business friendly” Supreme Court Justice doesn’t cut it.

Tags:

Always Room For One More

Tom McMahon has a fun blog, but he has this bad habit of going to blogs and getting banned. First it was Electrolite. OK, he wasn’t banned, he just had all the vowels removed from comments the Haydens didn’t care for. Then it was Cynical-C blog where the proprietor banned him from commenting. But that was just the warm up, because when he was banned at NoodleFood, he wasn’t just banned, he was condemned to hell along with it. I kid you not. The craziest thing about it is that Tom is such a mild commenter – calm, patient, insult free – which seems to drive wackos nuts. I mean, what set off Diana at NoodleFood off was that he, brace yourself, quoted a line from Amazing Grace which caused huge foaming at the mouth, and when she discovered that he had a link, a link mind you, to National Review, which periodically runs a negative review of Atlas Shrugged, that’s when she fell over backwards, and not only banned Tom from her site, but in full atheist majesty flung him straight into the pit of hell with Whittaker Chambers. As Dave Berry would say, you can’t make this stuff up.

It sounded like so much fun, I linked to my negative review of Atlas Shrugged (which the online version of National Review ran seven years ago – my how time flies) in his comments. So Tom graciously has reprinted my review of Atlas Shrugged so that I too can go straight to hell with him and Whittaker. Since I knew it was coming, I made pitcher of ice water to take with me for Tom and Whittaker. And if you want to join us there, you can let Tom know of your negative review of Atlas Shrugged.

Tags: ,

Poverty

Katrina has put poverty on, well, the middle burner these days. An op-ed in the Post Dispatch by Francie Broderick linked Katrina with recent roll backs in Medicaid coverage in Missouri noted this exchange thoughts it inspired:

“Two years ago, I was in Jefferson City when legislators debated the question of saving health care and social services by raising some taxes and closing some corporate loopholes. A woman opposing this approach literally shouted in my ear: “People should take care of themselves.” I made the mistake of responding. “Some people simply can’t,” I said, to which she again shouted “Well, they just have to do better.”…

Why have things changed so much? Why did we decide to let the most vulnerable fend for themselves? I think part of the answer is that we have been asking the wrong questions. Instead of asking “How do we make things better?” we have been asking what the individual has done or not done to get themselves in their situations. In other words: How is it their fault?

I think we also should be asking: What systems and policies have to change so that people can take better care of themselves and their families? What do we know that will work? How can we make it happen? “

Now, those are some excellent questions – I’m always a fan of “How do we make things better?” but I think it ignores the difference between people who can’t take care of themselves (or adequately participate in a market economy) and those who won’t. And for me that’s a huge difference, and oddly enough one of my problems with doctrinaire libertarianism since they want to reduce the problem to one for which they already have a solution, so doctrinaire libertarians simply the problem to one in which we are all adults sound of mind and body. But we aren’t and even my simple dichotomy of can’t and won’t isn’t so simple in real life as there aren’t simple binary functions of can/can’t and will/won’t, let alone can’t/won’t.

So if you look at the poor and see the problem of poverty as one of people who can’t, one set of solutions becomes clear; if you look at the poor and see the problem of poverty as one of people how won’t, a different set of solutions becomes clear. And since the tendency is that feedback from life only reinforces your previously held assumptions and beliefs, people of one camp find it hard to see the poor in any other way. I guess I look at it both ways, and that what’s needed for one group won’t do much for the other. For people who can’t participate adequately, whether through physical or mental issues, money by itself is a significant part of the solution. For people who won’t, money by itself only enables them in their won’t-ness and is something that they will be able to earn once they are no longer won’t-ers.

There is clearly a social/cultural aspect to poverty; I can remember watching an older writer being interviewed by Tim Russert and the writer related how he was talking to a friend of the same generation and they were talking about growing up poor during the great depression, which got them to talking about poverty today and the differences, and the writer said that the difference was that when he was growing up, the poor were middle class people without money but that being poor today is about far more than money.

Megan McArdle first looks at the poor and Katrina and has suggestions on why and how a “self-evacuation” in the face of a storm means the middle class and rich leave without difficulty and the poor stays behind. Then she effectively explores the difference between the poor and middle class, and hint, it isn’t about money:

“So I think that conservatives are right that many of the poor dig themselves in deeper. But conservatives tend to take a moralistic stance towards poverty that radically underestimates how much cultural context determines our ability to make good decisions.Sure, I go to work every day, pay my bills on time, don’t run a credit card balance and don’t have kids out of wedlock because I am planning for my future. But I also do these things because my parents spent twenty or so years drumming a fear of debt, unemployment, and illegitimacy into my head.

In other words, middle class culture is such that bad long-term decision making also has painful short-term consequences. This does not, obviously, stop many middle class people from becoming addicted to drugs, flagrantly screwing up at work, having children they can’t take care of, and so forth. But on the margin, it prevents a lot of people from taking steps that might lead to bankruptcy and deprivation. We like to think that it’s just us being the intrinsically worthy humans that we are, but honestly, how many of my nice middle class readers had the courage to drop out of high school and steal cars for a living?”

It is often said by advocates who only see those who can’t that nobody chooses to be poor. Well, I don’t choose to be fat, but I have looked in the mirror lately. So yes, some people choose to be poor, only the choice is never put in those terms. It’s the sum of a whole bunch of decisions not all of which seem related. And the poor have a host of influences that lead to poor decisions; the middle class has has a host of influences that lead to better decisions. So what can we do to influence the influences? And how much can government do as part of that influence? I leave these as excercises for the reader.

And to round out the trifecta, I turn to Joe Carter to has reposted his thoughts on the relativeness of poverty:

“I’m always hesitant to share this story because we in America tend to have a knee-jerk sympathy for the “down and out.” There are, however, many times, like in my family’s case, when pity is completely unwarranted. A lifetime of foolish decisions by my parents, rather than a dismal economy or lack of opportunity, led to our being poor. We reaped what they had sowed.But while being poor can be difficult, it isn’t the tragedy that many might be inclined to believe. From an early age I knew that while many people had more than I did, others had it much, much worse. That lesson was seared into my conscience while sitting in a pew watching Baptist missionaries present a slideshow detailing their latest mission trip. The images of true poverty gave our tiny congregation a glimpse into the everyday life in Ethiopia, a time of famine when a bucket of unshelled peanuts would be considered a feast. I was struck by the realization that as little as we had, these people had less. I was white-trash Texas poor; these people were Africa poor. “

My summation is that I know as a Christian I should help those in need; but I have to be careful not just because all needs aren’t equal, but all needs aren’t the same. A lack of money has many causes and the best help addresses the cause even as it addresses the lack. Even rich people have needs that money cannot solve.

Tags: ,

Hearing Voices

The hottest trend right now, so I’m told, is podcasting.  And the hottest trend podcasting is “Godcasting”, or religious (mainly Christian) podcasts – sermons, daily devotionals, etc. At last a new internet technology not driven by the porn industry.

American Moral Recovery

I’m not the only one who thinks that American society and culture is getting morally better. Check out this editorial by David Brooks at the Salt Lake Tribune (originally at the New York Times News Service, August 9, 2005): http://www.sltrib.com/opinion/ci_2927633

By a lot of hard statistical measures, we are now better-behaved than we were 15 years ago.

I particularly liked this note:
“The second thing that has happened is that many Americans have become better parents. Time diary studies reveal that parents now spend more time actively engaged with kids, even though both parents are more likely to work outside the home.”

This explains why: the top of my dresser is covered about 4 inches deep with unopened financial statements, the lawn needs mowing, the garage is full of junk that I have to sort through, and that I finally got around to filing my taxes in July. I’m concentrating on what matters – my wife and children! 

Tags:

Don’t Gore My Ox

Judge Lefkow, who was the target of one murder plot and whose family was murdered by a man who had appeared in her courtroom, spoke on Capital Hill the other day. Part of her testimony was a call for Congresspeople to “publicly and persistently repudiate gratuitous attacks on the judiciary” since “Fostering disrespect for judges can only encourage those that are on the edge, or on the fringe, to exact revenge on a judge who displeases them.”

I’m not going to address the content of her remarks, but the possible spin that could be put on them. I can easily see her remarks being denounced as an assault on the Constitution and/or the First Amendment – she’s calling for restriction on speech after all. Just because it’s voluntary wouldn’t stop the spin and complaining. Don’t agree?  Just consider Ari Fleischer’s remark about watching what you say and the hornet’s nest he stirred up.

OK, so what’s my point? My point is how we all filter people’s words and actions through our own thoughts and feelings towards them and their associations and can react oppositely to essentially the same words or actions depending on who’s doing the talking or taking the action.