So when is something not happening news? When it’s Karl Rove Not being indicted. Why is his not getting indicted news? Because a lot of people on the left were convinced he would be, and since most people in the news media were also convinced (since there is of course no overlap between lefties and the news media according to both lefties and the news media) that he would be, his not being indicted is almost bigger news than if he had been. Tom Maguire, who’s been all over this story from conception, has the story. I’m still wondering who’s worse, Nifong or Fitzgerald.
Extreme Tracker
Arclite theme by digitalnature | powered by WordPress
#1 by PoliticalCritic on June 13, 2006 - 1:44 pm
Quote
What a depressing day. Karl Rove will not face prosecution. Karl Rove is a scumbag and a crook. He has a long history of breaking the law. He just is good at getting away with it. He probably implicated someone else or bolstered the case against Libby to not get charged.
#2 by Kevin Murphy on June 13, 2006 - 2:49 pm
Quote
Or quite more likely there wasn’t enough evidence to indict. And since we all know the famous saying that a prosecutor can get a grand jury to indict a ham sandwich, I’m guessing there was very little evidence.
Since the Libby indictment seems to be built on jello, I’m thinking the Rove indictment would have to have been built on shaving cream.
As far as your remark about Mr. Rove, I don’t think there is any history of him breaking the law, just a lot of wishful thinking on the part of certain people.
#3 by Jeff H on June 15, 2006 - 5:46 pm
Quote
Well, have you ever seen Nifong and Fitzgerald in the same picture? Together at the same time?
They just might be one and the same person…
#4 by Kevin Murphy on June 16, 2006 - 11:22 am
Quote
I haven’t actually ever seen a picture of Nifong, so I couldn’t pick him out of a police lineup unless it only included the district attorneys of Durham county.