Posts Tagged John Kerry

Political Wisdom

I try not to be a partisan. I try to understand what somebody truly means, not look for the gotcha! or blindly defend. I don’t always succeed. Sometimes it’s my fault; sometimes, the speaker is just too outrageous.

I didn’t think I’d see this bit of wisdom topped:

“I will do the diplomacy necessary, and I have heavy cards to play — I’m not going to lay ’em all out on the table, no future president, no president should negotiate this in public. But let me tell you, I’ve got big cards to play to bring people to understand the stakes here”

John Kerry

Who knew Big John was such a poker player.

But then the big daddy of politics preached the following from a church pulpit (thus demonstrating that God is merciful because he wasn’t struck down):

“It’s wrong to demonize and cartoonize one another, and to ignore evidence, and to make false charges and to bear false witness. Sometimes I think our friends on the other side have become the people of the Nine Commandments.”

Bill Clinton

I guess it takes one to know one, eh perjurer-in-chief?

Tags: ,

Veterans Speak Out

Dodd gave a heads up about C-Span showing John Kerry’s testimony before a Senate committee in 1971 so I was able to watch it. I had a negative, visceral reaction to it. McQ had a much stronger, more personal reaction to Kerry’s anti-soldier (yes, Kerry in opposing the Vietnam war did so in a manner that slimed and smeared every soldier who fought there) actions after he returned with his medals in hand:

Well I’m very angry as well, Becky.

I’m angry that a nation treated its soldiers the way it did 35 years ago. I’m angry that actions of John Kerry led to that dishonorable treatment. But more than that, I’m angry that now that we who were maligned and smeared by Kerry and the VVAW want to speak out about it, people like you want us to shut up. 

Well we’re not going to shut up. 

We kept quiet about it for all those years and we’re damn tired of living with the lies Kerry and others told about us. We’ve as much right to speak as John Kerry. And we’ve got as much right to tell you and others he was full of crap as any other citizen of this country. 

Its not just YOUR country. Its OUR country as well. And this is about how OUR country treated us because of the lies people like John Kerry and the VVAW spread.

When Kerry grows the balls to stand up and tell the Vietnam Vets that he was wrong, he lied and he portrayed them falsely and that he’s sorry for doing so, then perhaps, some real healing can begin.

Until then, I agree with John O’Neill … he’s unfit for command.

Since I’m not a veteran, some will say I have no standing to comment on McQ’s remarks. But as a citizen, I agee with him.

Tags:

Promises, Promises

John Kerry is running an ad here in Missouri about how George Bush doesn’t care about healthcare but John does, and so much so he has a plan. The plan sounds wonderful of course – something for everybody, but it does have one big problem. The plan requires legislation to be passed for it to be implemented, and John Kerry is running for President, an office that can only veto legislation. I suppose it’s bad form to point out that Kerry has been a Senator for almost 20 years and so has had ample time to try to get this plan passed yet somehow has managed to propose nothing in his long yet unmentioned Senatorial career. I suppose it’s too bad that big John has been so busy this year to show up for votes, let alone do all the hard work in actually crafting legislation, but once he’s President apparently then he’ll have time he needs to work on legislation.

Now John Kerry isn’t alone in this odd habit of politicians who run for executive offices; just about everybody who runs for President or Governor runs on a legislative agenda. Even the Libertarians do this, although they mainly talk about the laws they’ll repeal, not pass. When candidate George Bush was running for President, he made tax cutting the main message of his campaign, and after his election he had to work with Congress to get tax cuts passed — ones to be honest that were not exactly what he first proposed but what he was willing to accept.

Our lack of understanding is shown in other races, where for instance we vote for members of the House or any state office based on abortion when the only people who matter on that subject are US Supreme Court justices, and the President and Senate since they select and confirm Supreme Court justices. And that doesn’t include all the platitudinous promises politicians dish out — like how they’ll lower crime without providing details (a colorful costume complete with cape usually springs to my mind) or they’ll be good for families — usually through shared values or some such, although they never explain if I’m supposed to adopt their values, or they’ll adopt mine, or if it’s even sanitary to be sharing values.

The problem isn’t the politicians, it’s the electorate that keeps voting for the politicians. We’re the ones who lap up all these feel good but can’t be implemented promises. The perversity of the electorate doesn’t end there. The one thing all Americans can agree on is that our Congresspeople should work tirelessly for our interests while other peoples Congresspeople should work for the common good (which surprisingly enough is amazingly similar to our interests).

Tags:

Cannae Again

Maybe I’m easily impressed, but I think the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth laid the best political trap for John Kerry I’ve ever seen. Hannibal would be proud.

Step one was to document and gather affidavits and write a book so that there was a wealth of credible material to draw from.

Step two was to put out an ad attacking Kerry’s service. Believe them or not, Kerry and the media have reacted by being outraged that anybody would crap on a combat veteran like the SBVTs did. The fact that they were combat veterans every bit as much as Kerry was immaterial. “How dare you impugn him! He fought and bled for his country!” Let’s face it, this is a strong defense.

Step three was to spring the trap. If you think the SBVTs were surprised by the reaction, you haven’t been paying attention to their second ad where they recount how John Kerry crapped on every Vietnam combat veteran after Kerry returned from Vietnam. The art of political Aikido in action is beautiful to behold. All that anger for Kerry gets turned around and used against him. “How dare he impugn his band of brothers, men who fought and died for their country.” The narrative becomes: if you thought you were mad at us when we said Kerry was a braggert, how should you feel when Kerry said all of us vets were rapists and murderers?

And what has to really hurt is that Kerry’s attacks are all in the public record. Kerry is his own accuser; the credibility of the SBVTs doesn’t matter on this attack. In a move of sheer brilliance, the SBVTs put on ex-POWs to testify to the emotional toll his accusations of atrocities took on them. What’s Kerry going to do — attack an ex-POW? McCain would lead the countercharge personally.

Kerry has only himself to blame for this. If he had run on his political record and his vision for the future, none of this would have come up, let alone matter. But by insisting that his actions 36 years ago mattered, that they were significant qualifications for office, he cannot insist that his actions 33 years ago don’t matter and are significantly disqualifying for office. I mean if he isn’t the same man he was 33 years ago, he sure isn’t the man he was 36 years ago. What was he thinking? How could he have forgotten?

Tags:

Back In The Straddle Again

John Kerry has come out against bringing troops home after he came out for it. Why the straddle? President Bush has announced that we will reduce troop strength in Germany and South Korea in move that has long been anticipated. In his opinion, Bush is going to screw it up. If Don’t Stop Thinking About Tomorrow was Clinton’s campaign theme song, Anything You Can Do, I Can Do Better is Kerry’s. [Thanks be to Dodd for the links]

Here’s what gets me — Kerry is complaining about withdrawing troops from two countries that have, shall we say, issues with America and with American troops on their soil and are at peace. He’s worried that it raises questions about our commitment. His plan for withdrawing troops from Iraq, where Iraqis are fighting and dying along side our soldiers, doesn’t raise questions, it answers them about our commitment in the negative. He wants to keep troops in two countries where they aren’t fighting, but remove them from a country where we are fighting our enemies, including al-Qaida. That’s better how?

The case for removing them from Germany is a slam dunk. Germany is threatened only by its runaway welfare state. Of course, when I think back on the proud history of Americans fighting alongside Germans against tyranny, oops, we never have. We fought against German mercenaries in the revolutionary war, against the Kaiser in WWI, against Hitler in WWII, and they declined to fight with us in the Balkans, Kuwait, Iraq, or Afghanistan. Oh, they’ve sent forces after the shooting has stopped — a few thousand here and there. But then we’ll still leave one of our new Brigades behind — a couple thousand troops to fly the flag and reassure the Germans that if the French ever do attack, we’ll at last fire shots in anger together.

We’ll still keep troops in Korea, but reducing the number and moving them to positions where they don’t get annihilated in the first North Korean artillery barrage seems like a good idea to me and increases our freedom of action while reducing tensions with the locals. And isn’t part of Kerry’s foriegn policy to get foreigners to like us again?

Last night I happened to catch Norm Coleman on the Daily Show. He pointed out that debate is good for democracy, but that by and large we don’t have them anymore in this country – instead we have partisan bickering (my words, not his). When Jon asked him why, Norm said because of this and gestured to include the show. Jon made the joke “Comedy Central is responsible?”, but Norm had made his point — if politicians are reduced to brief soundbites on TV, all they can do is bicker.

And that’s all that is going on here. We’ve gotten to the point that politicians will say anything to win, and then say and do whatever it takes to stay in power. This isn’t the fault of the politicians, it’s the fault of us, the American people, for putting up with this kind of politics. We have the ultimate power – to demand that politicians be responsive through the vote, to demand that the media be responsive through the viewership. We just need to use it.

Tags:

The Latest Molehill

Do I care about all the ins and outs of John Kerry’s military service in Vietnam? No. Is it worth digging through the records and trying to figure out whether or not he really earned 3 Purple Hearts? Absolutely not.

To the Republicans who think there is some hay to be made here — put aside partisanship and honor one of our vets.

To the Democrats who claimed GWB was AWOL and demanded all his records — you reap what you sow, so start reaping.

I would consider voting for the Kerry of 1968 – a decisive leader under fire, but the years have changed that youth into a man who starts his day by getting out of both sides of the bed and staying that way the rest of the day.

C’mon, important stuff is happening right now, and we’re worried about what happened thirty years ago?

And while I’m at it, can somebody tell me the news value in showing us that the remains of our soldiers killed overseas are well treated, flag draped, and flown through Dover AFB? There are better photos — like this one or this one

Tags:

Leadership?

Phil Carter has a post (and op-ed) about why he thinks President Bush’s National Guard service record matters.

“Leadership by example is a principle that’s hammered into every newly minted American military officer. … Above all else, it means never asking your soldiers, sailors, airmen or Marines to do something that you wouldn’t do yourself.”

Armed Liberal at Winds of Change replies:

“It’s well written, serious, accurate, and amazingly wrong.”

I have to agree with Armed Liberal. Is Phil really saying that you can’t be the civilian commander-in-chief if you weren’t in the military, and you can’t go to war as the CinC if you weren’t in combat yourself? That sure seems to the be the logical conclusion of his statements. I guess Phil won’t be able to vote for Edwards since John won’t be able to provide leadership to the Armed Forces as his role of President requires.

In an earlier post Phil said “Was he really the kind of junior officer that we now want to be Commander-in-Chief?” And I also have to agree with Jeff Medcalf when he says:

“Would it not be better to ask, “Has he been the kind of Commander-in-Chief that we would want to be Commander-in-Chief?” It’s not like he’s Kerry – with no record as CinC to run on. You can actually judge the President by how he’s actually performed his duties. Why do you need or even want to look at his record as a junior officer in performing such an evaluation?”

Bush has amassed a pretty clear record as CinC, and as far as I can tell, people are not having a hard time making up their minds about how he’s doing — love it or hate it.

Assuming Kerry is the Democratic Nominee, how should I judge how he’ll do? By then man he was thirty years ago, or the man of today?

John Kerry won his Silver Star for conspicuous gallantry and intrepidity in action while in charge of a three-boat mission. As the force approached the target area, all units came under intense automatic weapons and small arms fire from an entrenched enemy force less than fifty-feet away. Unhesitatingly, Lieutenant Kerry ordered his boat to attack as all units opened fire and beached directly in front of the enemy ambushers. The daring and courageous tactic surprised the enemy and succeeded in routing a score of enemy soldiers. Later, the boats again were taken under fire from a heavily foliated area and B-40 rocket exploded close aboard PCF-94; with utter disregard for his own safety and the enemy rockets, he again ordered a charge on the enemy, beached his boat only ten feet from the VC rocket position, and personally led a landing party ashore in pursuit of the enemy. Upon sweeping the area an immediate search uncovered an enemy rest and supply area which was destroyed. 

The John Kerry of then took swift and decisive action. Does that sound like the John Kerry of today who seems to be on both sides of every issue?

Would the John Kerry of today have earned that Silver Star? The John Kerry of today when comming under fire would keep on going without returning fire so that nobody else would have a cause to attack Kerry’s boat, and leave it up to the Justice Department to bring his attacker to justice. He would carefully review his actions to determine why they hate his boat, and ultimately conclude it is because the French aren’t on board. Then he would denounce his men as war criminals.

Tags: ,

A Man Who Doesn’t Know

John Kerry came to town the other day. The Boston Globe reports the following exchange on the plane coming here:

“Kerry also underlined that he would begin trying to broaden his base of voters. At one point on the plane, Kerry said he hoped to woo hockey-mad Michigan voters by lacing up his skates and playing a scrimmage with some members of the Detroit Red Wings before the state’s Feb. 7 caucuses. Yet in states such as Missouri, where the citizenry is less rabid about passing the puck, Kerry acknowledged that he needed to come up with some other way to connect with voters.
“I guess I’ll ride a bucking bronco or a bull or something,” Kerry joked. “I’m game. Whatever they got.”

I guess John has got us confused with Texas. Here’s a tip to all the politicians blowing through St. Louis before the primary – if you want to fit in and make a connection, just tell us what high school you went to. It’s really that simple.

Tags: