Posts Tagged policing

When they came for the Statues, …

George Floyd is killed by a police officer in Minneapolis, and protests erupt over his death in particular and police brutality in general.  In conjunction with those protests, riots and looting break out.  When people complain about the riots and looting, they are told that they need to keep the focus on George Floyd’s death and police brutality, and the rioters and looters are not part of the protests anyway.  So while we are still discussing improvements to policing from defunding the police to voting for more Democrats in cities that have had nothing but Democratic office holders for like 50 years, the protests pivot to pulling down statues of confederate generals (Democrats to a man BTW).  When people complain about the lack of process and the destruction of property involved, they are told that if Christian churches had statues of Satan people would wonder.  I’m still wondering at that analogy.  But before the paint was dry on the first confederate statue, pretty much any old statue was fair game to be vandalized, from the alarming like abolitionist Union generals including US Grant to the simply absurd like Miguel Cervantes and Stevie Ray Vaughan.  And there are threats to the Emancipation Memorial with Abraham Lincoln which was paid for by freed slaves and dedicated by Fredrick Douglass.  So tell me again how vandalizing and pulling over statues of Abraham Lincoln isn’t taking the focus off George Floyd and police brutality?  I know I’m slow and all because when people say defund the police I somehow leap to the conclusion that means taking money from police departments but I’m assured that it means something completely different, defang perhaps.  And don’t get me started on all the white protesters calling black cops racist and that word ordinarily no white person is allowed to use. 

Another puzzling thing is how when black communities hold vigils and protests when blacks are killed by other blacks (and they do with distressing regularity) none of this nonsense happens.  It gets local media attention, no looting occurs, no rioting, no vandalizing, no violence, just peaceful protest.

I’m thinking that there are a bunch of people who really don’t care about George Floyd, his death, other people’s deaths, police brutality, racism, logic, discussion, reason, they just want to steal and break things.  An orgy of destruction is their aim.  And not only they shouldn’t be encouraged, they should be condemned.

Tags: , ,

Kevin Vs. The Post

The Saint Louis Post Dispatch is St. Louis’ only major daily newspaper. It’s not a very good paper, and tilts alarmingly to the left (though many a leftist also dislikes it). While I would have canceled my subscription long ago, the Other Fearless Leader has informed me that because we save more in coupons from the paper than we spend on it, we are not cancelling. Tightwad that I am, I have complied. At the last Midwest Blogbash, the idea of a PostWatch site was discussed and quickly dismissed because somebody would have to actually read it reguarly.

This morning over my breakfast, I felt compelled to write a couple of letters to people at the post. The first was over an article about the drop in City homicides. I sent the following letter:

I’m glad to read that homicide is down across the St. Louis Metro area. I found it odd that the focus of the article was on the city of St. Louis when, as you relate in the last quarter of the article, it showed one of the lowest homicide rate decreases. I suppose it is to be expected that the police and prosecutors pat themselves on the back, but it isn’t clear that the other jurisdictions are doing the same thing as the city and thus it isn’t clear that the undoubtedly fine police and prosecutorial work is the cause. Perhaps a follow up article could shed more light on this.

That’s right, the article was all about how the City of St. Louis had a big drop in homicides, had quotes from prosecutors saying what a great job the prosecutors were doing and how the locals and feds were cooperating, had quotes from the police about how their aggressive police work was paying off. And then at the end they let on that St. Louis County had a larger drop in the homicide rate, along with the all the neighboring counties in Missouri. No back pats for these guys, though.

Then, a headline for a front page article set me off (I can’t give a URL for that because the miserable Post website only puts selected articles on the net), and here’s my letter for that one:

I noticed on today’s front page a sub heading about the suicide bombing in Iraq says “attacks across nation intensify”. In what way have they intensified? Are they more frequent, more deadly, involve larger numbers of attackers? Given that it is over an article about a repeat bombing that wasn’t as bad as the first one, it seems to be particularly inappropriate. I’ve been reading that the attacks have been intensifying ever since early May, shortly after President Bush declared an end to major combat operations. This is odd, since just before the intensification process started we were fighting a major war. I have yet to see a chart showing the intensity of combat versus time in Iraq, yet many media outlets tell me over and over that the attacks have intensified. Quite frankly, not only is it not supported by anything in the article, I don’t think it’s supported by the facts in Iraq. Please keep the headline(s) closer to the facts of the article.

I’m sure I’ll get a nice email blah blah blah but nothing will change. The Post gives me a choice – either get my news off the net, or get my news from late night talk hosts.

UPDATE: No replies to my email so far, but Andrew Sullivan linked to an oped in the NYT that claims attacks have declined from an average of 25 a day in July to about 15 a day today – still too many, but certainly refutes the claim of “intensifying attacks”.

Tags: , ,