Posts Tagged Abu Ghraib

Hersh Thoughts

Some thoughts about Seymour Hersh’s latest big story

I have no way to to know if the claims are accurate either in part or in totality. And neither does Seymour, or anybody else except those who are allegedly on the inside of the program. Uncritical acceptance or flat denial by anybody else reveals their biases, not the accuracy of the claims.

The bulk of the press is treating the claims as valid. There’s an old joke about the lawyer who can swim in shark infested waters because of “professional courtesy.” There seems to be “professional courtesy” within the media – any story that once appears is treated as true – sometimes long after it’s been debunked.

Either Hersh is making stuff up, or he’s being lied to by sources, or his sources are telling the truth but breaking their word and the law by revealing classified information. None of these possibilities is particularly appealing. 

Hersh throws the code word “Copper Green” around like 007 threw “Grand Slam” in Goldfinger.

I don’t find unnamed sources to be persuasive, and Hersh didn’t have good sources in the Army a year ago, As this story from 2003 makes abundantly clear. And all the meat of the current piece is contained in quotes from unnamed sources in the military.

Much is made of the military industrial complex, but little mention is made of the legal journalism complex. Journalists get information from three places – people who are regular sources for their own reasons; people who are one-time sources for their own reasons; and lawyers who do all the legwork and tiresome investigation in order to taint jury pools (think breast implants, side saddle fuel tanks, or rogue accelerating Audis). In all three cases, the journalist is in effect working for the source, and thus the sources motivations shape the coverage. And as pointed out in the Mudville Gazette, Hersh is working for the soldiers currently in the dock for the Abu Ghraib debacle whose defense is, in a dreary recapitulation of past failed excuses, “we were just following orders.” Gee, imagine, he just happened to have fall into his lap this program that would indicate that they really were just following orders. How convenient. And of course, Hersh feels no need to disclose his connection to the defense attorneys since he’s not being paid money. Such connections are never mentioned for that reason, despite the fact that information is money to journalists. The MIC at least defends the country, while the LJC defrauds it. 

Tags:

We’re Only Thinking Of You

Speaking of photos, what happened to showing pictures of flag draped coffins at Dover? Oh yeah, that was so last week. The press got much better pictures from Abu Ghraib to show that the war is a failure in Iraq. Getting the Dover photos was sooo important the press showed them to us once. Can you imagine how important that makes the stuff they never show us, and how insignificant the stuff they show us all the time?

UPDATE: I have joined my first Beltway Traffic Jam

Tags: ,

The Best and The Worst

Phil Carter has a superb roundup of Marines decorated for valor in Iraq. These are the best of the best.

Phil also has a couple of good posts about the failure of leadership at Abu Ghraib. And while I share the concern that the leadership be held accountable as well, I figure you should always unravel and prosecute from the bottom up. That way, you can go as high as the rot goes, while if you start where you think the top is and go down, you can’t go back higher than where you started. And I’d rather have the lower ranked people implicate and testify against higher ranked people; it just wouldn’t sit right for a general to get leniency for giving up her captains.

That reminds me – so far I’ve heard of privates, corporals, and sergeants performing the abuse, and then we jump to General Karpinski — what about all the officers in between? General Taguba faults the officers from the brigade commander on down — what happened to the “on down”? Just asking.

Tags:

Knee-jerk Is Just That

I respect Phil Carter; when he says “check out this book”, I hit the St. Louis County Library website and reserve it. But he didn’t think something through the other day:

McCain grills Rumsfeld: Sen. John McCain’s audition for a job in the U.S. Attorney’s office went quite well, in my opinion. He asked simple, direct questions like “What is the chain of command from the guards to you, Sec. Rumsfeld?” and “What were the guards’ orders?” These questions are critical. Anyone who’s been through basic training can tell you that one of the first things you learn is your chain of command, from you to the President. Moreover, every recruit learns the general orders of a sentry, and learns that knowing one’s orders is critical to mission success. Yet, Secretary Rumsfeld could not answer either simple question. He tapdanced around the question, but ultimately, never gave Sen. McCain an answer as to the line of command from PV2 Joe Snuffy up to the Secretary of Defense. PV2 Snuffy has to know that; shouldn’t the SecDef? That’s bad.”

Think a minute, Phil, about the claim that Rumsfeld should know the chain of command of every soldier in Iraq. It’s one thing for a soldier to know his chain of command because there is only one, but we’ve got 135,000 soldiers in Iraq, and for Rumsfeld to know the chain of command for every single one of them, well, he’d be superhuman beyond the wildest dreams of the most ardent Rummy-lover. What he needs to know is what his direct reports are responsible for, and who is responsible for what among those who report to his direct reports. That’s really all he should know generally about the chain of command below him. Ditto for orders. Anything more than that is micro management.

Tags: